RUM impact

Performance impact by rum provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for RUM impact

Performance impact by rum provider.

8
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
9,378
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
151ms
Best INP (p75)
Sentry
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Sentry 151ms 85.6%
5,571
2 Vercel Analytics 161ms 87.9%
415
3 New Relic Browser 169ms 85.0%
561
4 Cloudflare Web Analytics 170ms 81.7%
1,609
5 Netlify Analytics 178ms 80.8%
548
6 Akamai mPulse 198ms 75.4%
151
7 Dynatrace 225ms 55.4%
182
8 Datadog RUM 282ms 52.2%
341
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Vercel Analytics 0.4% 415 88% 161ms
DebugBear 0% 8 86% 181ms
Sentry 5.9% 5,571 86% 151ms
New Relic Browser 0.6% 561 85% 169ms
Cloudflare Web Analytics 1.7% 1,609 82% 170ms
Netlify Analytics 0.6% 548 81% 178ms
Akamai mPulse 0.2% 151 75% 198ms
SpeedCurve LUX 0% 25 75% 193ms
Raygun 0% 5 75% 206ms
Elastic RUM 0% 42 70% 204ms
Dynatrace 0.2% 182 55% 225ms
Datadog RUM 0.4% 341 52% 282ms
AppDynamics 0% 13 50% 214ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

88% of Vercel Analytics sites pass INP. Datadog RUM trails 36 points behind, leaving 48% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Sentry 5.9%
862.0s
86151ms
850.04
851.5s
77752ms
Cloudflare Web Analytics 1.7%
792.3s
82170ms
790.08
761.8s
581.1s
New Relic Browser 0.6%
742.5s
85169ms
770.10
672.0s
491.2s
Netlify Analytics 0.6%
722.6s
81178ms
760.10
731.9s
531.2s
Vercel Analytics 0.4%
842.2s
88161ms
900.03
811.6s
78756ms
Datadog RUM 0.4%
404.6s
52282ms
480.39
523.0s
651.1s
Dynatrace 0.2%
632.8s
55225ms
370.82
791.6s
77750ms
Akamai mPulse 0.2%
603.2s
75198ms
790.09
602.1s
471.1s
Elastic RUM 0%
593.0s
70204ms
650.24
712.2s
71860ms
SpeedCurve LUX 0%
951.8s
75193ms
800.09
951.3s
80760ms
AppDynamics 0%
672.9s
50214ms
780.07
562.1s
561.0s
DebugBear 0%
712.5s
86181ms
860.07
571.9s
711.1s
Raygun 0%
403.2s
75206ms
200.74
402.9s
80445ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Vercel Analytics leads on INP: 88% of its sites pass. Datadog RUM trails at 52%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Tag managers (8) → A/B testing (10) → Consent platforms (16) → Reviews (8) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured