The State of Web Vitals

Third-party domains

How many distinct third-party domains the page contacts.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Third-party domains

How many distinct third-party domains the page contacts.

7
on the typical site
half of sites sit at or below
11
1 in 4 sites exceed this
the top quarter
35
the heaviest 1%
the long tail
185,486
sites measured
phone field data

The typical site contacts 7 third-party domains. The heaviest 1% contact 35 or more.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median LCP site count and median LCP at each level of third-party domains

0ms 750ms 1500ms 2250ms 3000ms
2.5s
0 10744 21487
2–2 3–3 4–4 5–5 6–6 7–7 8–8 9–9 10–10 11–11 12–12 13–13 14–14 15–15 16+
Good (≤2.5s) Needs improvement Poor (>4s) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing LCP by third-party domains which level passes the LCP most often

Third-party domainsSitesPassing LCPLCP
2–2 14,735 88% 1.3s
3–3 14,643 84% 1.5s
4–4 14,511 83% 1.5s
5–5 13,612 82% 1.5s
6–6 13,499 81% 1.6s
7–7 13,033 82% 1.5s
8–8 11,899 81% 1.6s
9–9 11,134 81% 1.6s
10–10 9,381 80% 1.6s
11–11 8,090 80% 1.6s
12–12 6,705 80% 1.6s
13–13 5,603 80% 1.6s
14–14 4,574 80% 1.7s
15–15 3,730 79% 1.7s
16+ 21,487 78% 1.8s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Third-party domains 7. p75 11. p99 35. At the low end (2–2): LCP 1.3s. At the high end (16+): LCP 1.8s. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

Third-party domains are a common Core Web Vitals issue. First of all, each third-party domain needs a new connection. That means time is lost on a DNS lookup, a TCP handshake and a TLS negotiation. If you had served those resources from your main domain, the browser could have re-used the connection that is already open (that is why you want HTTP/3: one fast, re-usable connection for everything you control). When that domain serves a font or a stylesheet, the browser cannot render before the connection is ready. The connection setup delays the LCP.

Also, third-party resources are usually out of your control. They can become a SPOF (single point of failure) when their server is slow or down. They can also change in size or behaviour without your knowledge, and your Core Web Vitals change with them. Self-hosting fixes both problems at once. Preconnect only hides part of the connection cost.

How do third-party domains affect the Core Web Vitals?

Third-party domains correlate with the LCP. With few third-party domains, 88% of sites pass the LCP. Among the sites with the most third parties, 78% do. The decline is gradual. There is no point where sites suddenly start failing.

Go fix it Self-host Google Fonts → The case for limiting analytics and tracking scripts → Guide to resource prioritization →
Related signals Responsive image markup → Stylesheet loading mix → Image format mix → Images per page → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured