Speculation eagerness
How eager the winning speculation rule is, from conservative to immediate.
At a glance the headline numbers for Speculation eagerness
How eager the winning speculation rule is, from conservative to immediate.
0.6% of sites speculate on hover. 31.5% wait for the press.
Speculation eagerness who uses what, and how fast each group loads
Eager sites post the best median LCP (1.1s). Conservative sites trail at 1.9s. Correlation, not causation. computed
Passing LCP per speculation eagerness which group passes the LCP most often
94% of Eager sites pass LCP. Conservative trails 23 points behind, leaving 29% of its sites failing. computed
Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it
Eagerness is the trigger: when speculation starts. Conservative waits for the press, the moment between pointer-down and the completed click. Moderate starts on hover. Eager and immediate speculate before any signal, trading wasted loads for a longer head start.
Conservative is close to free: it only speculates on links the visitor is touching, and the press-to-click gap is head start nobody misses. Turn eagerness up only where the next click is predictable, like a paginated flow or a checkout funnel.
How does this affect the Core Web Vitals?
Speculation eagerness correlates with the LCP. With Eager, 94% of sites pass the LCP. With Conservative, 71% do. The causal link is weak: the choice mostly marks what kind of site made it.
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.