Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
10
Frameworks ranked
After min-sites filter
82,942
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
2.0s
Best LCP (p75)
htmx
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first
| # | Framework | LCP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | htmx | 2.0s | 88.8% | 141 | |
| 2 | Alpine.js | 2.0s | 87.7% | 1,306 | |
| 3 | React | 2.0s | 85.0% | 4,396 | |
| 4 | Svelte | 2.2s | 82.3% | 219 | |
| 5 | Next.js | 2.2s | 83.1% | 854 | |
| 6 | jQuery | 2.3s | 80.5% | 67,958 | |
| 7 | Vue | 2.4s | 77.0% | 5,677 | |
| 8 | Gatsby | 2.6s | 63.6% | 105 | |
| 9 | Nuxt | 2.7s | 69.8% | 628 | |
| 10 | Angular | 2.9s | 63.6% | 1,658 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing LCP per framework which group passes the LCP most often
FrameworkSitesPassing LCPp75
htmx 0.1% 141 2.0s
Alpine.js 1.4% 1,306 2.0s
React 4.6% 4,396 2.0s
Next.js 0.9% 854 2.2s
Svelte 0.2% 219 2.2s
jQuery 71.6% 67,958 2.3s
Vue 6% 5,677 2.4s
Remix 0% 26 2.3s
Nuxt 0.7% 628 2.7s
Angular 1.7% 1,658 2.9s
Gatsby 0.1% 105 2.6s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site
89% of htmx sites pass LCP. Gatsby trails 25 points behind, leaving 36% of its sites failing. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 71.6%
812.3s
95121ms
900.02
731.9s
521.3s
Vue 6%
772.4s
92145ms
840.04
711.9s
531.3s
React 4.6%
852.0s
93121ms
920.01
821.6s
681.0s
Angular 1.7%
642.9s
80188ms
580.26
682.0s
78731ms
Alpine.js 1.4%
882.0s
95133ms
920.01
791.7s
551.1s
Next.js 0.9%
832.2s
62253ms
670.17
831.6s
66900ms
Nuxt 0.7%
702.7s
86169ms
720.12
691.9s
581.0s
Svelte 0.2%
822.2s
90158ms
870.04
801.6s
70945ms
htmx 0.1%
892.0s
99125ms
890.03
871.6s
481.1s
Gatsby 0.1%
642.6s
67214ms
660.19
891.5s
74801ms
Remix 0%
772.3s
87147ms
770.07
592.1s
441.4s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per framework, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
htmx leads on LCP: 89% of its sites pass. Gatsby trails at 64%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →
Related signals CDN (7) → CMS (10) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.