CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS FCP TTFB
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

99.5%
Best: Squarespace
good INP
98.1%
Most used: WordPress
good INP
87.3%
Worst: TYPO3
good INP

Squarespace passes INP most often of any CMS. 99.5% of its sites pass. TYPO3 passes least at 87.3%. WordPress (the most-used CMS) sits at 98.1%. The gap is 12 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# CMS INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Wix 88ms 97.3%
5,217
2 Squarespace 92ms 99.5%
2,028
3 Joomla 96ms 95.1%
2,325
4 TYPO3 101ms 87.3%
95
5 Drupal 102ms 96.7%
2,990
6 WordPress 104ms 98.1%
59,040
7 Adobe Commerce 118ms 98.2%
989
8 Shopify 123ms 96.1%
7,625
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per CMS which group passes the INP most often

CMSSitesPassing INPp75
Webflow 0% 15 100% 84ms
Ghost 0% 37 100% 87ms
Hubspot cms 0% 5 100% 101ms
Squarespace 1.1% 2,028 100% 92ms
Adobe Commerce 0.5% 989 98% 118ms
WordPress 31.1% 59,040 98% 104ms
Wix 2.7% 5,217 97% 88ms
Drupal 1.6% 2,990 97% 102ms
Shopify 4% 7,625 96% 123ms
Joomla 1.2% 2,325 95% 96ms
TYPO3 0% 95 87% 101ms
Storyblok 0% 11 78% 146ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

100% of Squarespace sites pass INP. Joomla trails 5 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Wix 2.7%
951.6s
9788ms
980.00
931.1s
81666ms
Shopify 4%
961.7s
96123ms
940.02
951.1s
96516ms
Storyblok 0%
642.8s
78146ms
640.31
642.0s
301.4s
TYPO3 0%
941.5s
87101ms
920.02
891.3s
71878ms
Webflow 0%
1001.7s
10084ms
930.03
931.2s
71839ms
WordPress 31.1%
702.7s
98104ms
890.03
592.3s
311.8s
Drupal 1.6%
921.7s
97102ms
880.04
861.5s
68929ms
Joomla 1.2%
902.0s
9596ms
920.01
811.7s
551.1s
Adobe Commerce 0.5%
782.4s
98118ms
730.11
682.0s
311.6s
Squarespace 1.1%
892.1s
10092ms
900.04
861.5s
96541ms
Ghost 0%
1001.4s
10087ms
920.06
1001.1s
89581ms
Hubspot cms 0%
1001.5s
100101ms
800.03
1001.3s
80654ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CMS, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Squarespace leads on INP: 100% of its sites pass. Joomla trails at 95%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The CMS decides a lot about your Core Web Vitals before you write a line of your own code. It controls the HTML that ships, the scripts and styles that load by default, and how images are handled. Two sites on the same platform can score very differently depending on the theme and plugins, but the platform sets the starting point and the ceiling for how much you can tune.

Start with what the platform loads that you do not need. Strip the default scripts and styles that come with themes and plugins, defer the JavaScript that is not needed for the first paint, and make sure images go out in modern formats at the right size. On script-heavy platforms the biggest wins are usually in cutting and deferring what loads on every page.

How does your CMS affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CMS platforms, Wix reaches a good INP on 97.3% of sites; Shopify on 96.1%.

Related signals CDN (7) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured