Cookies per site

Cookies set during a cold visit: how many and their total size.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Cookies per site

Cookies set during a cold visit: how many and their total size.

2
cookie count
on the typical page
0 KB
cookie size
on the typical page
0 KB
1 in 4 pages exceed this
cookie size
94,748
sites measured
phone field data

The typical site sets 2 cookies.

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of cookies per site — n

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 14216 28431
0 1 2 3 4 5–6 7–8 9–11 12–15 16–20 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP by cookies per site — n which level passes the INP most often

Cookies per site — nSitesPassing INPINP
0 28,431 92% 93ms
1 11,929 91% 100ms
2 10,351 93% 97ms
3 8,592 94% 97ms
4 6,588 93% 97ms
5–6 8,539 91% 102ms
7–8 6,996 94% 97ms
9–11 6,346 93% 104ms
12–15 3,760 92% 111ms
16–20 2,081 91% 120ms
>p98 1,135 79% 142ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Cookies per site — n 2. p75 6. p99 21. At the low end (0): INP 93ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 142ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of cookies per site — size

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 18676 37351
0 0.1–0.132 0.132–0.174 0.174–0.23 0.23–0.303 0.303–0.4 0.4–0.528 0.528–0.696 0.696–0.919 0.919–1.21 1.21–1.6 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Passing INP by cookies per site — size which level passes the INP most often

Cookies per site — sizeSitesPassing INPINP
0 37,351 92% 94ms
0.1–0.132 17,467 93% 95ms
0.174–0.23 12,509 93% 95ms
0.23–0.303 8,127 93% 104ms
0.4–0.528 7,338 92% 109ms
0.528–0.696 1,654 90% 117ms
0.696–0.919 2,691 89% 120ms
0.919–1.21 3,934 92% 103ms
1.21–1.6 2,225 92% 108ms
>p98 1,452 82% 137ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Cookies per site — size 0 KB. p75 0 KB. p99 2 KB. At the low end (0 KB): INP 94ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 137ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The cookie count is a proxy. It tells you how many vendors run on the page. Most cookies exist for tracking and each tracker sets its own. The count grows with every tag the marketing stack adds. Cookies are also sent with every request to their domain, which adds header weight. That is rarely the real cost.

The real cost is what the cookies stand for. The vendors behind them run script on your main thread and delay every interaction (INP). They also inject banners, widgets and ads after the page looks settled (CLS). A rising cookie count means it is time to audit the tag manager, not to shrink cookies.

How does this affect the Core Web Vitals?

Cookie size correlates with the LCP. Where the cookie size is low, 85% of sites pass the LCP. Where it is high, 63% do. Cookie size has little causal relationship with the LCP. That makes a high cookie size more likely a result or an indication of a slow, heavily built site than a cause of a slow one. More cookies almost always means more trackers, more third parties and more script, and those do slow pages down.

Related signals Responsive image markup → font-display strategy → Stylesheet origin (1P/3P) → Fonts per page → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured