Cookies per site

Cookies set during a cold visit: how many and their total size.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Cookies per site

Cookies set during a cold visit: how many and their total size.

2
cookie count
on the typical page
0 KB
cookie size
on the typical page
0 KB
1 in 4 pages exceed this
cookie size
94,748
sites measured
desktop field data

The typical site sets 2 cookies.

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of cookies per site — n

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 14216 28431
0 1 2 3 4 5–6 7–8 9–11 12–15 16–20 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP by cookies per site — n which level passes the INP most often

Cookies per site — nSitesPassing INPINP
0 28,431 99% 45ms
1 11,929 99% 47ms
2 10,351 99% 48ms
3 8,592 99% 48ms
4 6,588 99% 48ms
5–6 8,539 99% 49ms
7–8 6,996 99% 50ms
9–11 6,346 99% 51ms
12–15 3,760 99% 57ms
16–20 2,081 99% 60ms
>p98 1,135 97% 73ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Cookies per site — n 2. p75 6. p99 21. At the low end (0): INP 45ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 73ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of cookies per site — size

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 18676 37351
0 0.1–0.132 0.132–0.174 0.174–0.23 0.23–0.303 0.303–0.4 0.4–0.528 0.528–0.696 0.696–0.919 0.919–1.21 1.21–1.6 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Passing INP by cookies per site — size which level passes the INP most often

Cookies per site — sizeSitesPassing INPINP
0 37,351 99% 46ms
0.1–0.132 17,467 99% 46ms
0.174–0.23 12,509 99% 47ms
0.23–0.303 8,127 99% 50ms
0.4–0.528 7,338 99% 52ms
0.528–0.696 1,654 99% 57ms
0.696–0.919 2,691 99% 59ms
0.919–1.21 3,934 99% 53ms
1.21–1.6 2,225 99% 55ms
>p98 1,452 97% 67ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Cookies per site — size 0 KB. p75 0 KB. p99 2 KB. At the low end (0 KB): INP 46ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 67ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The cookie count is a proxy. It tells you how many vendors run on the page. Most cookies exist for tracking and each tracker sets its own. The count grows with every tag the marketing stack adds. Cookies are also sent with every request to their domain, which adds header weight. That is rarely the real cost.

The real cost is what the cookies stand for. The vendors behind them run script on your main thread and delay every interaction (INP). They also inject banners, widgets and ads after the page looks settled (CLS). A rising cookie count means it is time to audit the tag manager, not to shrink cookies.

How does this affect the Core Web Vitals?

Cookie size correlates with the LCP. Where the cookie size is low, 89% of sites pass the LCP. Where it is high, 69% do. Cookie size has little causal relationship with the LCP. That makes a high cookie size more likely a result or an indication of a slow, heavily built site than a cause of a slow one. More cookies almost always means more trackers, more third parties and more script, and those do slow pages down.

Related signals Responsive image markup → font-display strategy → Stylesheet origin (1P/3P) → Fonts per page → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured