Speculation eagerness
How eager the winning speculation rule is, from conservative to immediate.
At a glance the headline numbers for Speculation eagerness
How eager the winning speculation rule is, from conservative to immediate.
0.6% of sites speculate on hover. 31.5% wait for the press.
Speculation eagerness who uses what, and how fast each group loads
Little daylight between the groups: every variant sits near 78ms median INP. computed
Passing INP per speculation eagerness which group passes the INP most often
97% of Conservative sites pass INP. None trails 7 points behind. computed
Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it
Eagerness is the trigger: when speculation starts. Conservative waits for the press, the moment between pointer-down and the completed click. Moderate starts on hover. Eager and immediate speculate before any signal, trading wasted loads for a longer head start.
Conservative is close to free: it only speculates on links the visitor is touching, and the press-to-click gap is head start nobody misses. Turn eagerness up only where the next click is predictable, like a paginated flow or a checkout funnel.
How does this affect the Core Web Vitals?
Speculation eagerness correlates with the INP. With Conservative, 97% of sites pass the INP. With None, 90% do. The causal link is weak: the choice mostly marks what kind of site made it.
The split is bigger on LCP. With Eager, 94% of sites pass it. With Conservative, 71% do.
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.