Analytics impact: 15 providers ranked | The State of Web Vitals 2026

LCP INP CLS

At a glance the headline numbers for Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

Providers ranked

After min-sites filter

100,052

Sites in sample

Combined across all items

0.05

Best CLS (p75)

StatCounter

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

#	Provider	CLS p75	Passing	Sites
1	StatCounter	0.05	87.0%	158
2	PostHog	0.08	84.3%	177
3	Plausible	0.08	80.4%	1,037
4	Pirsch	0.09	83.3%	53
5	Fathom	0.10	79.7%	167
6	Umami	0.10	76.5%	416
7	Matomo	0.10	76.9%	6,539
8	Universal Analytics	0.10	77.2%	38,198
9	Google Analytics 4	0.10	77.1%	50,965
10	Snowplow	0.10	75.0%	1,549
11	AT Internet/Piano	0.12	72.7%	265
12	Clicky	0.13	61.2%	133
13	Mixpanel	0.14	52.8%	59
14	Amplitude	0.18	62.5%	99
15	Adobe Analytics	0.19	57.1%	237

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv

Passing CLS per provider which group passes the CLS most often

ProviderSitesPassing CLSp75

StatCounter 0.2% 158 87% 0.05

PostHog 0.2% 177 84% 0.08

Simple Analytics 0.1% 49 83% 0.05

Pirsch 0.1% 53 83% 0.09

Plausible 1.1% 1,037 80% 0.08

Fathom 0.2% 167 80% 0.10

Universal Analytics 40.2% 38,198 77% 0.10

Google Analytics 4 53.7% 50,965 77% 0.10

Matomo 6.9% 6,539 77% 0.10

Umami 0.4% 416 77% 0.10

Snowplow 1.6% 1,549 75% 0.10

AT Internet/Piano 0.3% 265 73% 0.12

Heap 0% 42 72% 0.12

Chartbeat 0% 41 65% 0.13

Amplitude 0.1% 99 63% 0.18

Clicky 0.1% 133 61% 0.13

GoatCounter 0% 29 60% 0.18

Adobe Analytics 0.2% 237 57% 0.19

Mixpanel 0.1% 59 53% 0.14

Parsely 0% 18 0.18

Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

87% of StatCounter sites pass CLS. Adobe Analytics trails 30 points behind, leaving 43% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP

INP

CLS

FCP

TTFB

Google Analytics 4 53.7%

862.0s

9967ms

770.10

811.6s

601.1s

Universal Analytics 40.2%

852.1s

9967ms

770.10

811.6s

591.2s

Matomo 6.9%

901.8s

9970ms

770.10

861.4s

661.0s

Snowplow 1.6%

881.9s

9880ms

750.10

851.5s

611.1s

Plausible 1.1%

921.7s

9963ms

800.08

891.3s

70870ms

Umami 0.4%

842.1s

10065ms

770.10

851.4s

651.0s

AT Internet/Piano 0.3%

852.1s

9678ms

730.12

821.5s

67964ms

Adobe Analytics 0.2%

822.3s

94106ms

570.19

791.7s

70926ms

PostHog 0.2%

812.2s

9995ms

840.08

811.6s

651.0s

Fathom 0.2%

832.3s

10065ms

800.10

781.8s

591.2s

StatCounter 0.2%

851.8s

10061ms

870.05

821.5s

601.1s

Clicky 0.1%

851.7s

10062ms

610.13

821.3s

65956ms

Amplitude 0.1%

822.0s

90133ms

630.18

841.5s

74851ms

Mixpanel 0.1%

752.5s

9482ms

530.14

781.7s

69898ms

Pirsch 0.1%

752.1s

10076ms

830.09

851.3s

601.1s

Simple Analytics 0.1%

931.3s

10053ms

830.05

931.1s

70859ms

Heap 0%

752.5s

94127ms

720.12

751.5s

69907ms

Chartbeat 0%

1001.8s

85130ms

650.13

971.3s

82634ms

GoatCounter 0%

1001.1s

10054ms

600.18

100801ms

100279ms

Parsely 0%

932.0s

87168ms

70.18

871.6s

60973ms

60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

StatCounter leads on CLS: 87% of its sites pass. Adobe Analytics trails at 57%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv

Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →

Related signals Marketing pixels (10) → Session recording (11) → Ad networks (9) → Reviews (8) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured