RUM impact

Performance impact by rum provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for RUM impact

Performance impact by rum provider.

8
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
9,378
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
0.09
Best CLS (p75)
Netlify Analytics
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# Provider CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Netlify Analytics 0.09 78.5%
548
2 Sentry 0.09 76.8%
5,571
3 Vercel Analytics 0.10 76.1%
415
4 Cloudflare Web Analytics 0.10 75.3%
1,609
5 Akamai mPulse 0.17 63.8%
151
6 New Relic Browser 0.17 61.4%
561
7 Datadog RUM 0.19 63.8%
341
8 Dynatrace 0.39 32.1%
182
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per provider which group passes the CLS most often

ProviderSitesPassing CLSp75
DebugBear 0% 8 86% 0.07
Netlify Analytics 0.6% 548 79% 0.09
Sentry 5.9% 5,571 77% 0.09
Vercel Analytics 0.4% 415 76% 0.10
Cloudflare Web Analytics 1.7% 1,609 75% 0.10
SpeedCurve LUX 0% 25 75% 0.10
Datadog RUM 0.4% 341 64% 0.19
Akamai mPulse 0.2% 151 64% 0.17
AppDynamics 0% 13 64% 0.20
New Relic Browser 0.6% 561 61% 0.17
Elastic RUM 0% 42 57% 0.22
Dynatrace 0.2% 182 32% 0.39
Raygun 0% 5 0.23
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

79% of Netlify Analytics sites pass CLS. Dynatrace trails 47 points behind, leaving 68% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Sentry 5.9%
852.0s
9787ms
770.09
861.4s
74818ms
Cloudflare Web Analytics 1.7%
852.1s
9881ms
750.10
801.6s
561.2s
New Relic Browser 0.6%
772.4s
9791ms
610.17
721.9s
471.4s
Netlify Analytics 0.6%
812.3s
9389ms
790.09
841.5s
671.0s
Vercel Analytics 0.4%
861.9s
9782ms
760.10
881.3s
79739ms
Datadog RUM 0.4%
662.7s
93125ms
640.19
781.7s
65976ms
Dynatrace 0.2%
752.5s
95118ms
320.39
841.4s
76745ms
Akamai mPulse 0.2%
762.5s
97110ms
640.17
731.8s
511.2s
Elastic RUM 0%
712.6s
94120ms
570.22
811.6s
71852ms
SpeedCurve LUX 0%
901.6s
95119ms
750.10
951.2s
75772ms
AppDynamics 0%
732.5s
10081ms
640.20
642.0s
73832ms
DebugBear 0%
862.0s
100117ms
860.07
861.7s
71898ms
Raygun 0%
03.1s
100114ms
00.23
332.4s
100402ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Netlify Analytics leads on CLS: 79% of its sites pass. Dynatrace trails at 32%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Tag managers (8) → A/B testing (10) → Consent platforms (16) → Reviews (8) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured