CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric TTFB LCP INP CLS FCP
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

80.8%
Best: Cloudflare
good FCP
75.9%
Typical CDN
good FCP
74.3%
Worst: No CDN (origin)
good FCP

Cloudflare passes FCP most often of any CDN. 80.8% of its sites pass. No CDN (origin) (the most-used CDN) passes least at 74.3%. The gap is 7 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by FCP at p75, fastest first

# CDN FCP p75 Passing Sites
1 Fastly 1.6s 80.3%
6,980
2 Cloudflare 1.6s 80.8%
26,787
3 Akamai 1.8s 76.5%
5,431
4 Vercel 1.8s 75.9%
1,171
5 CloudFront 1.8s 75.4%
6,917
6 No CDN (origin) 1.8s 74.3%
158,548
7 Netlify 1.9s 70.8%
410
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing FCP per CDN which group passes the FCP most often

CDNSitesPassing FCPp75
Cloudflare 12.7% 26,787 81% 1.6s
Fastly 3.3% 6,980 80% 1.6s
Akamai 2.6% 5,431 77% 1.8s
Vercel 0.6% 1,171 76% 1.8s
CloudFront 3.3% 6,917 75% 1.8s
No CDN (origin) 75.2% 158,548 74% 1.8s
Netlify 0.2% 410 71% 1.9s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good FCP (1.8s at p75) · one value per site

81% of Cloudflare sites pass FCP. Netlify trails 10 points behind, leaving 29% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
No CDN (origin) 75.2%
812.2s
92125ms
900.01
741.8s
561.2s
Cloudflare 12.7%
862.0s
91137ms
890.02
811.6s
69936ms
Fastly 3.3%
842.1s
91124ms
880.01
801.6s
73860ms
CloudFront 3.3%
802.3s
88154ms
790.08
751.8s
611.1s
Akamai 2.6%
812.2s
94129ms
880.02
771.8s
581.1s
Vercel 0.6%
802.3s
85168ms
840.05
761.8s
87595ms
Netlify 0.2%
732.6s
64336ms
660.23
711.9s
471.1s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CDN, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Cloudflare leads on FCP: 81% of its sites pass. Netlify trails at 71%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

A CDN sits between your server and your visitors, serving content from a location near each of them instead of from a single origin. That shortens the trip every request makes, which shows up first in Time to First Byte and then in how quickly the main content can paint. A good CDN also handles caching, compression and modern protocols, so the gains reach well beyond raw distance.

Start by making sure the CDN is actually caching your pages and assets rather than passing everything through to the origin. Turn on compression and HTTP/2 or HTTP/3, set sensible cache headers, and check that your largest image is served from the edge. A CDN that passes every request through to the origin gives you almost none of this.

How does your CDN affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CDNs, Fastly reaches a good FCP on 80.3% of sites; Netlify on 70.8%.

Related signals CMS (12) → Frameworks (11) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured