CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS FCP TTFB
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

96.3%
Best: Shopify
good FCP
88.4%
Typical CMS
good FCP
67.5%
Worst: WordPress
good FCP

Shopify passes FCP most often of any CMS. 96.3% of its sites pass. WordPress (the most-used CMS) passes least at 67.5%. The gap is 29 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by FCP at p75, fastest first

# CMS FCP p75 Passing Sites
1 Wix 816ms 92.4%
5,827
2 Shopify 1.0s 96.3%
8,575
3 TYPO3 1.1s 92.9%
104
4 Squarespace 1.2s 95.4%
2,260
5 Drupal 1.3s 88.4%
3,361
6 Joomla 1.5s 85.6%
2,555
7 Adobe Commerce 1.8s 74.0%
1,096
8 WordPress 2.0s 67.5%
65,509
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing FCP per CMS which group passes the FCP most often

CMSSitesPassing FCPp75
Ghost 0% 46 100% 835ms
Webflow 0% 20 100% 549ms
Other / custom 0% 16 100% 1.3s
Shopify 4.1% 8,575 96% 1.0s
Squarespace 1.1% 2,260 95% 1.2s
TYPO3 0% 104 93% 1.1s
Wix 2.8% 5,827 92% 816ms
Drupal 1.6% 3,361 88% 1.3s
Joomla 1.2% 2,555 86% 1.5s
Adobe Commerce 0.5% 1,096 74% 1.8s
WordPress 31.1% 65,509 68% 2.0s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good FCP (1.8s at p75) · one value per site

96% of Shopify sites pass FCP. WordPress trails 28 points behind, leaving 32% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
WordPress 31.1%
762.5s
10062ms
780.09
682.0s
361.7s
Shopify 4.1%
971.6s
9978ms
860.06
961.0s
97468ms
Wix 2.8%
921.6s
10048ms
960.02
92816ms
72932ms
Drupal 1.6%
931.6s
10057ms
780.09
881.3s
69916ms
Joomla 1.2%
921.8s
10049ms
790.08
861.5s
64966ms
Squarespace 1.1%
941.9s
10059ms
820.08
951.2s
98463ms
Adobe Commerce 0.5%
832.2s
10069ms
660.14
741.8s
311.5s
TYPO3 0%
951.4s
10048ms
790.08
931.1s
78764ms
Ghost 0%
1001.2s
10051ms
570.14
100835ms
94484ms
Webflow 0%
1001.2s
10073ms
670.11
100549ms
100201ms
Other / custom 0%
1001.5s
10079ms
570.14
1001.3s
77790ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CMS, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Shopify leads on FCP: 96% of its sites pass. WordPress trails at 68%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The CMS decides a lot about your Core Web Vitals before you write a line of your own code. It controls the HTML that ships, the scripts and styles that load by default, and how images are handled. Two sites on the same platform can score very differently depending on the theme and plugins, but the platform sets the starting point and the ceiling for how much you can tune.

Start with what the platform loads that you do not need. Strip the default scripts and styles that come with themes and plugins, defer the JavaScript that is not needed for the first paint, and make sure images go out in modern formats at the right size. On script-heavy platforms the biggest wins are usually in cutting and deferring what loads on every page.

How does your CMS affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CMS platforms, Wix reaches a good FCP on 92.4% of sites; WordPress on 67.5%.

Related signals CDN (7) → Frameworks (11) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured