Frameworks performance

How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS FCP TTFB
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Frameworks performance

How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.

91.6%
Best: React
good CLS
89.9%
Most used: jQuery
good CLS
58.2%
Worst: Angular
good CLS

React passes CLS most often of any framework. 91.6% of its sites pass. Angular passes least at 58.2%. jQuery (the most-used framework) sits at 89.9%. The gap is 33 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# Framework CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Alpine.js 0.01 91.9%
2,671
2 htmx 0.01 93.1%
301
3 React 0.01 91.6%
9,570
4 jQuery 0.02 89.9%
143,509
5 Vue 0.04 84.7%
12,115
6 Svelte 0.05 85.9%
467
7 Remix 0.10 75.0%
53
8 Nuxt 0.12 72.2%
1,309
9 Next.js 0.18 65.5%
1,832
10 Gatsby 0.19 66.7%
218
11 Angular 0.26 58.2%
3,377
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per framework which group passes the CLS most often

FrameworkSitesPassing CLSp75
htmx 0.1% 301 93% 0.01
Alpine.js 1.3% 2,671 92% 0.01
React 4.6% 9,570 92% 0.01
jQuery 69.6% 143,509 90% 0.02
Svelte 0.2% 467 86% 0.05
Vue 5.9% 12,115 85% 0.04
Remix 0% 53 75% 0.10
Nuxt 0.6% 1,309 72% 0.12
Gatsby 0.1% 218 67% 0.19
Next.js 0.9% 1,832 66% 0.18
Angular 1.6% 3,377 58% 0.26
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

93% of htmx sites pass CLS. Angular trails 35 points behind, leaving 42% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 69.6%
802.3s
95121ms
900.02
721.9s
521.3s
Vue 5.9%
762.5s
92144ms
850.04
692.0s
531.3s
React 4.6%
842.1s
92120ms
920.01
811.6s
681.0s
Angular 1.6%
652.9s
79191ms
580.26
692.0s
77745ms
Alpine.js 1.3%
892.0s
94136ms
920.01
801.7s
551.2s
Next.js 0.9%
832.2s
60268ms
660.18
831.6s
67915ms
Nuxt 0.6%
692.7s
84175ms
720.12
682.0s
611.0s
Svelte 0.2%
842.1s
89153ms
860.05
811.6s
69935ms
htmx 0.1%
902.0s
97130ms
930.01
831.6s
571.1s
Gatsby 0.1%
622.9s
69213ms
670.19
891.5s
77767ms
Remix 0%
782.2s
78191ms
750.10
731.8s
501.2s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per framework, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

htmx leads on CLS: 93% of its sites pass. Angular trails at 58%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

A JavaScript framework shapes how much code runs in the browser to put your page on the screen. Some render on the server and ship light; others send a large bundle and rebuild the page on the client, which lands on the main thread and shows up in INP. The framework is not destiny, but its defaults and how you use them decide how much JavaScript the visitor has to pay for.

Start by looking at what ships to the browser and when it runs. Render on the server where you can, split the bundle so each page only loads what it needs, and defer the work that is not required for the first interaction. Framework JavaScript runs on the main thread, so the less of it the browser has to execute, the better INP gets.

How does your framework affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the JavaScript frameworks, Alpine.js reaches a good CLS on 91.9% of sites; Angular on 58.2%.

Related signals CDN (7) → CMS (12) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured